[
next
] [
prev
] [
prev-tail
] [
tail
] [
up
]
Chapter 3
A Perturbative Introduction to GR
Page 71, Eq (3.129): the argument of the first delta function was wron and there was an overall factor of
missing
(Thanks to Diego Blas)
Page 73, first line after Eq (3.143): the statement is true to first order in
h
. (Thanks again to Diego Blas).
Page 79, second of Eqs (3.175): the + sign should be deleted.
Page 84, Eqs. (3.199): the terms on the r.h.s. of the first equation are total derivatives only after contraction with
h
μσ
.
Page 91, Eqs. (3.236): the parenthesis on the l.h.s. of the second equation are misplaced. it should be
δ
(
S
(1)
+
S
(2)
)
.
Page 105, Eq. (3.288): there is a symmetrization parenthesis missing:
[
next
] [
prev
] [
prev-tail
] [
front
] [
up
]